<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anna Filina &#187; css</title>
	<atom:link href="http://annafilina.com/blog/tag/css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://annafilina.com/blog</link>
	<description>Web applications developer, conference organizer, geek...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:02:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>CSS Incompatibilities</title>
		<link>http://annafilina.com/blog/css-incompatibilities/</link>
		<comments>http://annafilina.com/blog/css-incompatibilities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[css]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://annafilina.com/blog/archives/3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that different browsers display our CSS differently. What are the major differences? Here is what I found from my own experience (often the hard way):

IE doesn&#8217;t support table, table-cell, etc. for the display property; 
IE includes the padding in its width (width:50px &#38; padding:3px will total 50px in IE and 56px in Firefox)
IE<div><a href="http://annafilina.com/blog/css-incompatibilities/">Read the rest...</a></div><br />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that different browsers display our <a title="CSS" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/">CSS</a> differently. What are the major differences? Here is what I found from my own experience (often the hard way):</p>
<ul>
<li>IE doesn&#8217;t support table, table-cell, etc. for the display property; </li>
<li>IE includes the padding in its width (width:50px &amp; padding:3px will total 50px in IE and 56px in Firefox)</li>
<li>IE doesn&#8217;t support properties such as max-width, min-height, etc.</li>
<li>Firefox has some of it&#8217;s own CSS rules (moz-css) which are not supported by any other browsers</li>
<li>IE adds a margin to its forms</li>
</ul>
<p>There are tons of other differences that you can add to this list. I solve most of my layout problems with one or two tables for the most complex parts, thus saving myself hours of debugging and tweaking.</p>
<p>P.S.: use lists instead of tables for your horizontal menus (for god&#8217;s sake!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://annafilina.com/blog/css-incompatibilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
